Library · Traffic · How to run this
Rockerbox MTA brand-perf map is not Triple Whale pixel brand-perf board
On one Rockerbox MTA brand-perf map, take |brand-objective $ − performance-objective $| over performance-objective $. That quotient is RB brand-perf gap %. Triple Whale pixel boards and brand-path keyword cuts never feed this MTA map.
Pair: Brand-vs-performance gap under Traffic. Triple Whale twin: TW brand-perf. Search twin: RB brand-gap.
MTA brand-perf map fields
Brand-objective $ — Rockerbox dollars tagged upper-funnel reach / awareness on the MTA brand-perf map.
Performance-objective $ — Rockerbox dollars tagged lower-funnel conversion / ROAS on that same map.
RB brand-perf gap % = |brand-objective − performance-objective| ÷ performance-objective × 100. When RB brand-perf gap % climbs, objective maps disagree on that MTA cut — reconcile those tags; never invent a RB brand-perf chip.
Hard stops
Never invent RB brand-perf gap %. Never paste Triple Whale pixel or Rockerbox branded-vs-nonbrand exports into brand-objective/performance-objective boxes. Never park owned/organic dollars in the brand-objective field. Never fuse maps when one Rockerbox MTA brand-perf map owns the swing.
See also: Traffic, TW brand-perf, RB brand-gap, RB email-paid.
Procedure
- Type brand-objective $ and performance-objective $.
- Read RB brand-perf gap %.
- Reconcile MTA objective maps when RB brand-perf gap % is material.
Failure modes
- Inventing RB brand-perf gap %.
- Pasting Triple Whale pixel or Rockerbox branded-vs-nonbrand exports into brand-objective/performance-objective boxes.
- Parking owned/organic dollars in the brand-objective field.
Worked example
None on this page yet. When one lands it will be a real case: what broke, the number, and what changed. Not a composite.
Glossary
- RB brand-perf gap %
- |Brand-objective $ − Performance-objective $| ÷ Performance-objective $ × 100 on one Rockerbox MTA brand-perf map.
Work with us — We run this job on your accounts. Services
FAQ
- Is this Triple Whale brand-vs-performance gap?
- Rockerbox MTA brand-perf map vs Triple Whale pixel brand-perf board. [Brand-vs-performance gap](/manuals/triple-whale-brand-vs-performance-gap) stays on Triple Whale. Brand-objective $ / performance-objective $ for Rockerbox belong on this MTA map.
- Is this Rockerbox branded-vs-nonbrand gap?
- MTA objective split vs brand-path keyword mix. [Branded-vs-nonbrand gap](/manuals/rockerbox-branded-vs-nonbrand-gap) nets brand-path $ against nonbrand $. Here you only stack upper-funnel brand-objective $ against lower-funnel performance-objective $.
- What RB brand-perf gap % should I invent?
- None. Source brand-objective $ and performance-objective $ from the same Rockerbox MTA brand-perf map.