Library · Chargebacks · How to run this
Representment win is not reason-code win mix
Wins ÷ representments make win %. Type both.
Pair: Representment win rate on Chargebacks. Reason mix: reason-code win mix. EV: representment fee vs recovery.
What you type
Wins — representments closed won in the Disputifier window.
Representments — fights filed in that same window.
Win % = wins ÷ representments × 100. Fix packet / reason selection when win % is thin — do not invent a win chip.
What not to do
Do not invent win %. Do not mix alert refunds into representments. Do not treat RDR accepts as wins. Do not average every MID when one owns the hole.
Related: Chargebacks, reason-code win mix, representment fee vs recovery, alert-to-fight lag.
Procedure
- Type wins and representments.
- Read win %.
- Fix packet / reason selection when win % is thin.
Failure modes
- Inventing win %.
- Mixing alert refunds into representments.
- Treating RDR accepts as wins.
Worked example
None on this page yet. When one lands it will be a real case: what broke, the number, and what changed. Not a composite.
Glossary
- Representment win %
- Wins ÷ representments × 100.
Work with us — We run this job on your accounts. Services
FAQ
- Is this reason-code win mix?
- Sibling fight grain. [Reason-code win mix](/manuals/chargeflow-reason-code-win-mix) is wins ÷ fights for one reason code. This page is overall representment win %.
- Is this representment fee vs recovery?
- Related EV. [Representment fee vs recovery](/manuals/representment-fee-vs-recovery) is fee + labor vs recover $. This page is win rate.
- What win % should I invent?
- None. Type wins and representments from the same Disputifier window.